1 The Tychonoff Theorem
1.1 (§37) The Tychonoff theorem
- •
Thm. (Tychonoff.) For any and any compact spaces , the product is compact in the product topology.
- •
Rmk. Proved above for finite (tube lemma). The general case is omitted here; it needs the axiom of choice. Application below instead.
1.2 The profinite integers
- •
Notation. iff ; classes ; ring with , ; surjection .
- •
Lem. Give each and the discrete topology. Then is compact Hausdorff, and is injective and continuous.
Proof. Each is finite, hence compact; Tychonoff. Injective: if for all , take .
- •
Def. For , reduction , ; note . Set
the ring of profinite integers (operations termwise; a topological ring).
- •
Lem. is a closed subspace of , hence compact Hausdorff.
Proof. where is continuous and is discrete.
- •
Lem. corestricts to an injective continuous ring map , with dense image.
Proof. Given and a basis neighborhood constrained at finitely many , let be a common multiple of those and choose with ; then for each constrained .
- •
Def. The subspace topology on from is the Fürstenberg topology. ( is not an embedding of discrete .)
- •
Thm. (Euclid, ca. 300 BC.) There are infinitely many primes.
Proof. Fürstenberg’s 1955 argument. In the Fürstenberg topology every nonempty open set is infinite, and each is closed. If there were finitely many primes, would be closed, so its complement would be open and finite — contradiction.