1 The Fundamental Group
1.1 (§51) Homotopy of paths
- •
Def. are homotopic, , if there is a map with , . is a homotopy.
- •
Notation. ; the rule is a path from to .
- •
Def. A path in from to : a map with , .
- •
Def. Paths from to are path homotopic, , if there is with The endpoints stay fixed throughout.
- •
Lem. and are equivalence relations.
Proof. Reflexive: constant homotopy. Symmetric: . Transitive: concatenate, for , for ; continuous by the pasting lemma since .
- •
Notation. = homotopy class; for paths, = path homotopy class.
- •
Ex. Straight-line homotopy. For (or into any convex ): . So any two maps into a convex set are homotopic; and if are paths with the same endpoints, this is a path homotopy.
- •
Ex. In the punctured plane , with , , : (the straight-line homotopy stays in ), but the straight-line homotopy from to passes through the origin. In fact — proved later.
Note. and are homotopic as maps if endpoints are released. That is why path homotopy, not homotopy, is the right relation here.
- •
Def. For a path and a path , the product
Continuous by the pasting lemma.
- •
Lem. and . Hence is well defined.
- •
Thm. on path homotopy classes satisfies:
- (1)
Associativity: ;
- (2)
Units: with the constant path, ;
- (3)
Inverses: with , and .
Proof. All three are reparametrisation homotopies. For (1) let the breakpoints slide: traverse on , on , thereafter. Draw the square with the two subdivision patterns and interpolate.
- (1)
- •
Caution. is not a group operation on paths — only on path homotopy classes, and only when endpoints match.
1.2 (§52) The fundamental group
- •
Def. A loop at : a path from to .
- •
Def. = set of path homotopy classes of loops at , with . By the theorem above it is a group: unit , inverse . The fundamental group of based at .
- •
Ex. convex, .
- •
Def. (Functoriality.) a based map. Define
- •
Lem. is a group homomorphism.
- •
Thm. and .
- •
Cor. a homeomorphism an isomorphism. So is a topological invariant of based spaces.
- •
Def. a path from to . Define
- •
Thm. is an isomorphism; and .
- •
Cor. path connected for all .
- •
Caution. The isomorphism depends on the path: different paths give conjugate isomorphisms, which differ when is non-abelian. So “” without a base point is well defined only up to isomorphism.
- •
Rmk. with the path component . sees only one path component.
- •
Def. is simply connected if it is path connected and is trivial. Then any two paths with the same endpoints are path homotopic.
- •
Thm. (Brouwer.) Every map has a fixed point. [Mk §55]
1.3 (§53) Covering spaces
- •
Def. a surjective map. An open is evenly covered if with each open and each a homeomorphism. The are the sheets (slices).
- •
Def. is a covering map (and a covering space of ) if every point of has an evenly covered neighborhood.
- •
Ex. Trivial covering: discrete, ; sheets .
- •
Lem. Each fibre is discrete.
- •
Lem. Every covering map is an open surjection, hence a quotient map.
Proof. For open and : pick over , let be its sheet; is open in and contains .
- •
Thm. , , is a covering map.
Proof. For : , with inverse . Four such cover . Each interval wraps once around.
- •
Def. is a local homeomorphism if each has a neighborhood with open and a homeomorphism.
- •
Lem. Covering map local homeomorphism.
- •
Caution. Converse fails: is a local homeomorphism but not a covering map — no neighborhood of is evenly covered.
- •
Ex. , , i.e. . A covering map for each . (E.g. .)
- •
Prop. (Restriction.) a covering map, , is a covering map.
- •
Prop. (Products.) is a covering map.
- •
Ex. covers the torus; each unit square wraps once around.
- •
Ex. Figure eight. ; then , the infinite grid, covers .
- •
Ex. , in real coordinates , is a covering map: it factors through as a product of coverings.
1.4 (§54–§55) The fundamental group of the circle [Mk §54–55]
- •
Thm. , generated by the loop that goes once around; the isomorphism sends a loop to its winding number, i.e. the endpoint of its lift along .
- •
Rmk. Machinery needed: path lifting, homotopy lifting, the lifting correspondence. Work these through from Munkres §54; then §55 gives no-retraction of onto , and Brouwer’s theorem.
1.5 (§58) Deformation retracts and homotopy type
- •
Def. an inclusion. A retraction is a map with .
- •
Def. A deformation retraction of onto : a homotopy from to , with for all , .
- •
Ex. , , and
- •
Lem. a homotopy from to with for all (a homotopy relative to ) on .
Proof. For a loop at , the composite is a path homotopy from to .
- •
Thm. a deformation retract of
Proof. gives . And is a homotopy rel from to , so by the lemma.
- •
Ex. , infinite cyclic.
- •
Ex. Doubly punctured plane deformation retracts onto the figure eight , meeting at . So .
- •
Rmk. With , the classes of the two circle loops: , the free group on two generators — every element a word in , with no relations beyond the group axioms. We prove less:
- •
Prop. is not abelian.
Proof. Use the path-connected threefold cover of which is onefold over one circle and twofold over the other. Starting at the right vertex, the lifts of and end at different points, so . Draw the covering graph.
1.6 (§59) The fundamental group of
- •
Thm. with open and simply connected and path connected is simply connected.
Proof. Base point ; loop . The cover of the compact metric space has a Lebesgue number, giving with each inside or . Delete any with ; then all . Pick a loop in agreeing with at each ; patch the piecewise path homotopies. Finally dies already in .
- •
Thm. is simply connected.
Proof. , ; stereographic projection gives , likewise ; and is path connected.
- •
Rmk. Same argument: is simply connected for all .
1.7 (§60) Fundamental groups of some surfaces
- •
Def. Product group : , unit , inverse .
- •
Thm. With , , the map is a group isomorphism.
Proof. Surjective: given loops set . Injective: path homotopies assemble to .
- •
Ex. free abelian on two generators.
- •
Rmk. The inclusion induces the canonical surjection (abelianisation). The commutator maps to : in the square model of , the loop is the boundary of , which is nullhomotopic in .
- •
Def. Double torus : the quotient of an octagon with boundary word Cutting along the diagonal gives two tori each with a disc removed; regluing along that circle is the connected sum.
- •
Thm. is not abelian.
Proof. Let be the edges labelled and ; then . There is a retraction : collapse the cutting circle to get , then retract each torus onto a circle. So is injective, and has a non-abelian subgroup.
- •
Thm. , and are pairwise non-homeomorphic.
Proof. and are abelian and non-isomorphic; is not abelian. Fundamental groups distinguish all three.
- •
Rmk. Closing remark (3-manifolds). A compact 3-manifold splits into finitely many compact connected ones; a connected one is irreducible if every embedded bounds an embedded , and reducible ones simplify by cutting along such a sphere and capping off. By Thurston’s geometrization conjecture, proved by Perelman, an irreducible 3-manifold decomposes along canonical tori into geometric pieces (eight model geometries). Combining the classifications — Waldhausen for Haken manifolds, Seifert for six of the geometries, Mostow rigidity for the hyperbolic one — the fundamental group turns out to be a complete invariant for irreducible 3-manifolds, apart from lens spaces.
— end of notes —