0.1 (§25) Components and local connectedness
- •
Def. iff some connected contains both. An equivalence relation; classes are the components of .
- •
Thm. Components are connected, disjoint, and cover ; every nonempty connected subset lies in exactly one.
Proof. Connectedness of a component : fix , write with each connected containing ; apply the common-point theorem.
- •
Thm. A finite product of connected spaces is connected.
Proof. In : then links to . Then induct.
Rmk. True for arbitrary products too.
- •
Def. iff a path joins them; classes are the path components. Same statements as for components.
- •
Ex. (topologist’s sine curve): one component, two path components and . Note is open but not closed in ; is closed but not open.
- •
Def. is locally connected at if every neighborhood of contains a connected neighborhood of : . Likewise locally path connected.
- •
Ex. is locally (path) connected. is not: small neighborhoods of points of are disconnected.
- •
Caution. Connected locally connected, in either direction.
- •
Thm. locally connected every component is open. locally path connected every path component is open.
- •
Thm. Each path component lies in a unique component. If is locally path connected, components path components.
Proof. with a union of other path components; all are open, so is clopen in the connected , forcing .
0.2 (§26) Compact spaces
- •
Def. covers if ; an open cover if all are open. A subcover is a subcollection that still covers.
- •
Def. is compact if every open cover of has a finite subcover.
- •
Ex. Finite spaces are compact. is not: has no finite subcover. But with is compact.
Note. Compactness is a property of the topology, not of the set — worth saying out loud before students attach it to “bounded”.
- •
Rmk. Story break. Tell the Atiyah–Segal examination anecdote from S. G. Krantz, Mathematical Apocrypha: a nervous student, asked for an example of a compact set, answers “the real line” — and Segal rescues him with “in what topology?” The joke is exactly the previous two examples.
- •
Ex. is compact: one catches all but finitely many ; cover those individually.
- •
Ex. Any with is compact: one nonempty leaves a finite complement.
- •
Lem. is compact every cover of by open subsets of has a finite subcollection covering .
Proof. Translate along . Lets you work in and forget the subspace topology.
- •
Thm. A closed subspace of a compact space is compact.
- •
Thm. A compact subspace of a Hausdorff space is closed.
Proof. Fix . For each separate by . Finitely many cover ; then misses . Compact sets generalise finite sets here.
- •
Lem. (Extracted from that proof.) Hausdorff, compact, there are disjoint open and .
- •
Thm. The continuous image of a compact space is compact.
- •
Thm. a map, compact, Hausdorff. Then
- (1)
is a closed map;
- (2)
surjective is a quotient map;
- (3)
bijective is a homeomorphism;
- (4)
injective is an embedding.
Proof. All from (1): closed compact compact closed. This is the standard device for upgrading continuous bijections — contrast .
- (1)
- •
Ex. : preimages of compact sets need not be compact. Def. is proper if is compact for every compact .
- •
Lem. (Tube lemma.) compact, open with there is a neighborhood with .
Proof. Cover by basis boxes ; finitely many suffice; take .
- •
Caution. Fails without compactness of : take .
- •
Thm. compact compact. Cor. Finite products of compact spaces are compact.
Proof. For each , finitely many cover ; the tube lemma widens this to . Then finitely many cover . Union of finitely many finite collections.
- •
Def. has the finite intersection property if every finite subcollection has nonempty intersection.
- •
Thm. is compact every collection of closed sets with the finite intersection property has .
Proof. Purely the contrapositive of the definition, read through complements. Write the four successive rephrasings on the board.